Key points
- Critical assumptions remain identifiable
- Risks and dependencies stay linked to the choice
- Variances trigger analysis, not an automatic conclusion
- The next review has an explicit reason
Define what should trigger a review
A fixed date can be useful, but a signal is often more relevant: losing a channel, crossing a cash threshold, a regulatory change or invalidation of a critical assumption.
| Object | Review question | Example signal |
|---|---|---|
| Assumption | Is it still plausible? | Sustained variance outside the range |
| Risk | Has exposure changed? | New critical dependency |
| Trajectory | Is financing still sufficient? | Earlier cash low point |
| Decision | Do the conditions still hold? | Switching threshold crossed |
Govern around decisions
Atlas retains the context of the decision file, Map structures flows and risks, Pilot projects the financial trajectory and Plot helps prepare a synthesis.
Together, these capabilities structure the assumptions, risks, dependencies and trajectories required for a clear and documented human review.
Workspaces relevant to this question
Each link states the role of the workspace. Connections rely only on supported shared objects and demonstrated exchanges for the decision file.