Strategic decision support: method, tools and a defensible file
A six-stage method to frame a strategic decision, compare scenarios, state assumptions and document a defensible human trade-off.
Read the guide ↗Resources · method guides
Written guides that take you from a strategic question to a defensible decision file: the overall method, practical situations and analytical tools, each with its method and its limits.
Starting point
The pillar guide sets out the approach: question, options, criteria, scenarios and the final choice.
Practical guides
Decision file, scenarios, commercial economics, operational risks, financial trajectory, web network mapping and the use of AI: concrete situations, step by step.
Structure a strategic decision file around the question, evidence, assumptions, scenarios, recommendation, risks and trade-off record.
Read the guide ↗Build coherent scenarios, use shared criteria, test sensitive assumptions and document the trade-off without creating false precision.
Read the guide ↗Build and compare price-volume-cost scenarios using explicit volume, margin, variable cost, fixed cost, promotion and break-even assumptions.
Read the guide ↗Map operating flows, dependencies, critical points and risks, then connect each exposure, control and owner to the strategic decision file.
Read the guide ↗Connect activity assumptions, P&L, working capital, cash, investment and financing in a readable three-to-five-year financial trajectory.
Read the guide ↗Understand PageRank, betweenness, harmonic centrality and Louvain communities in a bounded web network, with the limits needed for a defensible reading.
Read the guide ↗Use AI to question and summarise a decision file while keeping sources, assumptions, missing evidence, limits and human responsibilities visible.
Read the guide ↗Method guides
Portfolio and growth matrices, multi-criteria analysis, positioning, uncertainty, simulation, markets, location and media investment: what each tool reveals, and its limits.
Structure options, criteria, scales, weights and sensitivity tests to compare strategic choices without turning a score into an automated decision.
Read the guide ↗Calculate market growth and relative market share, expose missing evidence and use BCG quadrants as a diagnosis rather than an automated order.
Read the guide ↗Classify an option by existing or new products and markets, document boundary cases and turn the quadrant into assumptions to test.
Read the guide ↗Define market attractiveness and competitive strength, their factors, weights and directions, then test sensitivity before reading the nine boxes.
Read the guide ↗Choose Ansoff, BCG, GE-McKinsey or multi-criteria analysis, then test priorities against budgets, capacity, dependencies and review conditions.
Read the guide ↗Build market-attractiveness and competitive-strength axes from weighted factors, then interpret the position without imposing universal thresholds.
Read the guide ↗Select two interpretable dimensions, document where coordinates come from and use the map as a positioning hypothesis rather than causal evidence.
Read the guide ↗Structure decisions, uncertain events, probabilities and payoffs, then calculate expected monetary value without treating it as a forecast.
Read the guide ↗Define uncertain variables and distributions, simulate the model, then read means and percentiles without presenting the output as a forecast.
Read the guide ↗Calculate BDI and CDI by segment or region, then use the MOI ratio as a bounded investigation signal rather than automatic proof of potential.
Read the guide ↗Calculate a theoretical breaking point with Reilly and attraction probabilities with Huff, then test the model against field evidence.
Read the guide ↗Calculate share of voice, share of market, ESOV and MSAR with consistent denominators, then interpret the gap without turning it into a causal forecast.
Read the guide ↗Your decision